THE STRUCTURE OF METHODOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS AND THE LEVELS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT

Aidos Mukhatayev; Serik Omirbayev; Аndrii Biloshchytskyi; Khanat Kasenov; Sapar Toxanov; Saulesh Mukanova; Botagoz Zhekibayeva

doi:10.59787/2413-5488-2025-49-1-129-138

Авторлар

Aidos Mukhatayev Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan
Serik Omirbayev Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan
Аndrii Biloshchytskyi Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine
Khanat Kasenov Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan
Sapar Toxanov Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan
Saulesh Mukanova Karaganda Buketov University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan
Botagoz Zhekibayeva Karaganda Buketov University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59787/2413-5488-2025-49-1-129-138

Кілт сөздер:

methodological competence, university instructors, pedagogical knowledge, professional development, digital learning, higher education, assessment strategies, teaching innovation, blended learning, student-centered learning.

Аңдатпа

The development of methodological competence among university instructors is a key factor in improving the quality of higher education and adapting to modern educational challenges. This study explores the structure, components, and levels of methodological competence, emphasizing the need for continuous professional development. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining theoretical analysis with a review of the best global practices. The findings suggest that methodological competence encompasses pedagogical knowledge, research skills, adaptability, and innovation. The study also proposes a five-level classification system to assess instructors' methodological competence. Enhancing this competence through targeted professional development and digital learning strategies is crucial for improving teaching effectiveness and student outcomes in higher education.

Автор өмірбаяндары

Aidos Mukhatayev, Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan

Candidate of pedagogical sciences, Professor, Department of general education disciplines, aidos.mukhatayev@astanait.edu.kz, ORCID 0000-0002-8667-3200
Serik Omirbayev, Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan

Doctor of Economic sciences, Professor, the First vice-rector, serik.omirbayev@astanait.edu.kz, ORCID 0000-0001-7643-3513
Аndrii Biloshchytskyi, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine

Doctor of Technical sciences, Professor, the Vice-rector on science and innovation, a.b@astanait.edu.kz, ORCID 0000-0001-9548-1959
Khanat Kasenov, Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan

PhD in Education, Director, Department of Quality assurance department, khanat.kassenov@astanait.edu.kz, ORCID 0000-0002-7555-4919 (corresponding author)
Sapar Toxanov, Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan

PhD in Information systems, the Vice-rector of Social and Educational work, sapar.toxanov@astanait.edu.kz, ORCID 0000-0002-2915-9619
Saulesh Mukanova, Karaganda Buketov University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan

Doctor of pedagogical sciences, Associate professor, Dean, Faculty of additional training, fdo@buketov.edu.kz, ORCID 0000-0002-9734-7574
Botagoz Zhekibayeva, Karaganda Buketov University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor of the Department of «Pedagogy and Methodology of Primary Education», bzhekibaeva@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0003-0671-8550

Әдебиеттер тізімі

Agnihotri, S. (2024). The Role of Reflective Practice in Enhancing Teacher Efficacy. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i6.5574.

Brookfield, S. (1996). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Choice Reviews Online, 33(09), 33–5232. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-5232.

Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. http://www.revistacomunicacion.org/pdf/n3/resenas/research_design_qualitative_quantitative_and_mixed_methods_approaches.pdf.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399.

Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10013454789.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional Capital: Transforming teaching in every school. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB18399261.

Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2024). The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. In BRILL eBooks (pp. 511–522). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004702813_021.

Kassenov, N. K., Mukhatayev, N. А., Omirbayev, N. S., Omarova, N. S., & Toxanov, N. S. (2022). Domestic and international experience in organizing the process of professional competence development of teachers. Bulletin of Toraighyrov University Pedagogics Series, 4.2022, 331–342. https://doi.org/10.48081/jbrv7653.

Korthagen, F. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002.

Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2006). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.001.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record the Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.

Mukhatayev, A., Omirbayev, S., Kassenov, K., Biloshchytskyi, A., & Omarova, S. (2024). Perception of IT teachers on their methodological development: A case at Kazakhstan universities. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 7(4), 1354–1364. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i4.3297.

Selwyn, N. (2010). Schools and schooling in the digital age. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840795.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004.

Tondeur, J., Roblin, N. P., Van Braak, J., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education: in search of a new curriculum. Educational Studies, 39(2), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2012.713548.

Williams, J. K. (2008). The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, by Curtis J. Bonk and Charles R. Graham (Eds.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons, 2006. 580 pages, hard coverThe Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, by BonkCurtis J. and GrahamCharles R. (Eds.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons, 2006. 580 pages, hard cover. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7(1), 132–133. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.31413871.