In Press

APPLICATION OF THE OPEN-BOOK EXAM IN THE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT: ANALYSIS OF THE OPINIONS OF TEACHERS AND STUDENTS

Авторы

  • Zhassyn Mukhambet Academy of Physical Education and Mass Sport
  • Andrey Shunko Academy of Physical Education and Mass Sports
  • Daulet Azerbayev Academy of Physical Education and Mass Sports

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59787/2413-5488-2025-52-4-%25p

Ключевые слова:

open-book exam, academic integrity, student stress, critical thinking, physical education and sports, knowledge assessment, educational process, professional competencies

Аннотация

The article considers the prospects of using the open-book exam in the educational environment using the example of the Academy of Physical Education and Mass Sports of Astana. The study is aimed at studying the opinions of teachers and students regarding the effectiveness of this form of knowledge assessment. The survey involved 12 teachers of the Department of Physical Education and Coaching, as well as 73 students of the training program "Physical Education Teacher and Sports Coach". The majority of the surveyed teachers (87%) are ready to consider the possibility of using open-book exams, highlighting among the advantages stress reduction (75%), development of critical thinking (50%) and compliance with academic integrity (37%). Students also positively assess the potential of the format: 55% expect a decrease in stress, 66% consider it useful for their future profession. At the same time, 77% of students noted the possibility of maintaining academic integrity when using this format. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of preferred variations of the open-book exam: the majority of teachers (62%) prefer to use their own notes, 37% - educational and scientific literature. The complete refusal to use Internet resources demonstrates a cautious attitude towards digital technologies in the process of knowledge assessment. The data obtained indicate a high potential for the introduction of open-book exams into the educational process of universities of physical education and sports, provided that the methodology and content of examination tasks are carefully developed.

Биографии авторов

  • Zhassyn Mukhambet, Academy of Physical Education and Mass Sport

    PhD, associate professor, head of the academy of coaching excellence, Academy of physical education and mass sports, Astana, Kazakhstan, e-mail: zhas_ski@mail.ru, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7435-9022 (corresponding author)

  • Andrey Shunko, Academy of Physical Education and Mass Sports

    candidate of pedagogical sciences, senior lecturer, Academy of physical education and mass sports, Astana, Kazakhstan, e-mail: chastmira@gmail.com, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3041-5501

  • Daulet Azerbayev, Academy of Physical Education and Mass Sports

    master of pedagogical sciences, sport education and coaching department director, Academy of physical education and mass sports, Astana, Kazakhstan, e-mail: daulet.azerbayev@bk.ru, ORCID ID: 0009-0000-2979-1449

Библиографические ссылки

Abdulmajeed Mamhusseini, A. (2020). Attitudes of faculty and students toward open-book examination as a teaching strategy in nursing education at Hawler Medical University. EJNM, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15218/ejnm.2020.16

Akhtar, F. (2021). De-radicalization through education reforms: Comparative analysis of closed-book and open-book examination regime. Journal of Political Studies, 28, 107.

Battaglia, A. A. (2019a). Assessment supporting higher-order thinking skills: Evaluation of the introduction of an open-book final exam in a neuroscience module for third-year undergraduate students at King’s College London. In INTED2019 Proceedings (pp. 6636–6642). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1612

Battaglia, A. A. (2019b). Assessment supporting higher-order thinking skills: Evaluation of the introduction of an open-book final exam in a neuroscience module for third-year undergraduate students at King’s College London. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martinez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), 13th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2019) (pp. 6636–6642). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1612

Davies, D. J., McLean, P. F., Kemp, P. R., Liddle, A. D., Morrell, M. J., Halse, O., Martin, N. M., & Sam, A. H. (2022). Assessment of factual recall and higher-order cognitive domains in an open-book medical school examination. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27(1), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10076-5

Gharib, A., Phillips, W., & Mathew, N. (2012). Cheat sheet or open-book? A comparison of the effects of exam types on performance, retention, and anxiety. Online Submission, 2(8), 469–478. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED537423

Опубликован

05.12.2025

Выпуск

Раздел

ДИСКУССИИ, РАЗМЫШЛЕНИЯ